Evaluating a President: Sample Essay
Sample
Essay
|
Explanation
|
President Obama was elected in 2008 and re-elected in 2012. When he
became president, the economy was doing worse than any other time since the
Great Depression. Though things have
slowly improved, President Obama’s popularity has gone down. Many of his
major ideas have faced intense opposition, including the Affordable Care Act.
This essay will evaluate his time as president.
Historians
sometimes use three major criteria to evaluate presidents: his or her
policies, effectiveness, and character. However, this essay will only focus
on President Obama’s policies and his effectiveness. These are
the two most important criteria because they focus on a president’s actions,
and what he or she accomplished. Someone’s actions are more important than
what kind of person they are. What kind of person someone is comes out in
what they do.
President
Obama has been an effective president who policies have helped the country.
When President Obama had a Congress that was willing to work with him, he was
able to pass many important laws. And most of those laws had a positive
impact on the country. The country is a better place today than it was in
2008.
From
2008-2010, President Obama had a Congress with a Democratic majority. Being a
member of the same party as most of Congress allowed him to be a quite
effective president. Just a few months into his presidency, he passed a law
that has been called the “Stimulus Bill.” This law was intended to help save
the country’s economy from how poorly it had been doing. The fact that he was
able to pass this law so soon after being elected shows just how effective he
was. He had no time to get used to the job or learn how to be president, but
it didn’t stop him. The next year, President Obama passed the Affordable Care
Act, commonly known as “Obamacare.” This is proof of Obama’s effectiveness
because health care has been a controversial issue for a long time. Many
presidents from Harry Truman in the 1940s to Bill Clinton in the 1990s have
tried to pass a major new health care law and failed. President Obama
succeeded where they failed.
President
Obama’s policies have, on balance, been good for the country. The Stimulus
Bill might not have gotten the economy back to where it was, but it still
helped reverse a downward trend. Even though the recovery hasn’t been
complete, we are no longer in crisis. Unemployment was almost 10% when he
first became president, and now it is under 6%. This shows that some of his
policies have worked. The Affordable Care Act has also been good for the
country. Almost 10 million Americans now have health insurance who didn’t
before, and more are signing up each day.
Some may
argue that President Obama has not been effective because since 2011, when a
different party became the majority in Congress, he hasn’t been able to do
much. They might argue that he has failed to pass new laws on guns,
immigration, and climate change. They are correct that there aren’t new laws
about those issues, but they are wrong to blame it on Obama. It is hard for
any president to pass controversial new laws when the majority of Congress
disagrees with him. Even FDR, one of our most effective presidents, wasn’t
able to pass many more laws when there started to become an increased number
in Congress who thought differently than him.
In
conclusion, President Obama has been an effective leader with beneficial
policies. He has passed major laws that helped the economy and healthcare. It
is important to be able to evaluate a president because in a democracy we are
often asked to vote in elections where the current president is running for
re-election. If we do not know how to judge a president’s accomplishments, we
won’t know how we should vote. Part of being a good citizen is knowing about
the world around you. Evaluating Obama is good practice for evaluating future
presidents.
|
This is the Introduction. I give
background information about President Obama and state what I will do in this
essay.
This is the Evaluation Criteria paragraph.
It explains how I will evaluate President Obama. I have chosen to use the
categories of policies and effectiveness, though you may have chosen any
combination of the 3 or all 3 (policies, character, effectiveness.
This is my claim- notice in my
claim I mention something about both his policies and his effectiveness,
because those are the 2 categories I picked in the previous paragraph.
This paragraph contains my evidence for
President Obama being effective. It
also has my analysis: why my evidence proves that he was effective.
You need both evidence and analysis.
This paragraph contains my evidence for
President Obama’s policies being positive. It also has my analysis: why my evidence proves his
policies were good. You need both evidence and analysis.
This paragraph is my counter-claim. It shows why
the other side is wrong.
This paragraph is
my conclusion. It sums up
my argument and connects it to the world.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment